[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16517967#comment-16517967
]
Sim Bamford commented on TINKERPOP-1988:
----------------------------------------
Take the object "marko", which is a "person" vertex. When this goes through the
hasLabel('person') traversal, it returns an object, so it's not true that it
"does not return any objects". However, this object IS removed from the
traversal stream. In my opinion, the sentence should read, for example:
"The {{not()}}-step (*filter*) removes any objects from the traversal stream
which are returned by the traversal provided as an argument."
> minor error in documentation
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-1988
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1988
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tinkergraph
> Affects Versions: 3.3.3
> Reporter: Sim Bamford
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Not sure where to put a problem with the documentation(?) The page:
> [http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/]
> States:
> "The {{not()}}-step (*filter*) removes objects from the traversal stream when
> the traversal provided as an argument does not return any objects."
> Isn't that wrong? surely the traversal is removed if the argument does return
> objects?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
