[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16563474#comment-16563474
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2005:
-------------------------------------------
Github user spmallette commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/899#discussion_r206485044
--- Diff:
gremlin-server/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/server/op/AbstractEvalOpProcessor.java
---
@@ -222,9 +223,33 @@ protected AbstractEvalOpProcessor(final boolean
manageTransactions) {
* script evaluation.
* @param bindingsSupplier A function that returns the {@link
Bindings} to provide to the
* {@link GremlinExecutor#eval} method.
+ * @see #evalOpInternal(ResponseHandlerContext, Supplier,
BindingSupplier)
*/
protected void evalOpInternal(final Context context, final
Supplier<GremlinExecutor> gremlinExecutorSupplier,
--- End diff --
it was good that you kept the old signature as other people might depend on
this. i was thinking we might deprecate, this version of the method, but
perhaps that is not necessary or perhaps even undesired. I guess, the question
is whether or not the new method would ever be called directly or would it
always be called through this method? Perhaps the other method should be
`private`?
> Intermittent NullPointerException in response handling
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2005
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2005
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: driver
> Affects Versions: 3.2.9
> Reporter: stephen mallette
> Priority: Minor
>
> This stacktrace was reported to me:
> {code}
> 06:11:01 2018-07-05 13:11:01,706 ERROR 13:11:01,618 Could not process the
> response
> 06:11:01 java.lang.NullPointerException: null
> 06:11:01 at
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.driver.Handler$GremlinResponseHandler.lambda$channelRead0$39(Handler.java:220)
> 06:11:01 at java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1257)
> 06:11:01 at
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.driver.Handler$GremlinResponseHandler.channelRead0(Handler.java:220)
> 06:11:01 at
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.driver.Handler$GremlinResponseHandler.channelRead0(Handler.java:197)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.SimpleChannelInboundHandler.channelRead(SimpleChannelInboundHandler.java:105)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:362)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:348)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:340)
> 06:11:01 at
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.driver.Handler$GremlinSaslAuthenticationHandler.channelRead0(Handler.java:123)
> 06:11:01 at
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.driver.Handler$GremlinSaslAuthenticationHandler.channelRead0(Handler.java:67)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.SimpleChannelInboundHandler.channelRead(SimpleChannelInboundHandler.java:105)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:362)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:348)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:340)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.handler.codec.MessageToMessageDecoder.channelRead(MessageToMessageDecoder.java:102)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:362)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:348)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:340)
> 06:11:01 at
> org.apache.tinkerpop.gremlin.driver.handler.WebSocketClientHandler.channelRead0(WebSocketClientHandler.java:94)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.SimpleChannelInboundHandler.channelRead(SimpleChannelInboundHandler.java:105)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:362)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:348)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:340)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageDecoder.fireChannelRead(ByteToMessageDecoder.java:310)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageDecoder.channelRead(ByteToMessageDecoder.java:284)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:362)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:348)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:340)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$HeadContext.channelRead(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:1334)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:362)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:348)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.fireChannelRead(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:926)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioByteChannel$NioByteUnsafe.read(AbstractNioByteChannel.java:134)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKey(NioEventLoop.java:644)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeysOptimized(NioEventLoop.java:579)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeys(NioEventLoop.java:496)
> 06:11:01 at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:458)
> 06:11:01 at
> io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$5.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:858)
> 06:11:01 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> {code}
> Some initial investigation seems to indicate that it is intermittent and
> likely some form of timing issue. Will probably be hard to recreate. Hesitant
> to just make the problem go away without understanding why it is happening.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
