It should at least. We have never tested it, but the docs say that 'mvn clean install -Dnuget' can be used to create the package. So, the other Maven commands should work the same way. If it doesn't directly work or if you run into any other problems, then I can also give it a try.
Am 27.09.2018 um 15:20 schrieb Stephen Mallette: > uh....i don't remember if there is anything special i need to do to make > that happen. does it just deploy with the standard deploy instructions? > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:13 AM Florian Hockmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Great, do you also plan to include the Gremlin.Net.Template in this >> prerelease? >> >> >> Am 26.09.2018 um 13:00 schrieb Stephen Mallette: >>> Just a quick note that I plan to do the .NET 3.4.0-rc2 release tomorrow. >>> >>> Here's the updated todo list for the 3.2.10/3.3.4: >>> >>> + TINKERPOP-2025 - https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/935 ready to >>> merge >>> + TINKERPOP-2019/TINKERPOP-2043 - Possible bugs in .NET >>> + TINKERPOP-1906 - Make status messages/attributes from the server more >>> available in .NET (maybe already done on TINKERPOP-1913 to some degree) >>> + TINKERPOP-1972 - Two failing tests in .NET (I can't seem to get to the >>> bottom of this one) >>> + https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/920 - minor refactoring, just >>> had some activity on it, so it looks like this one will get in: >>> + https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/922 - gremlin-js script >>> submission (critical imo - i would hold release over this) >>> + https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/928 - this one just needs to >> be >>> merged i think - it's past cooling down period (florian has been on >> holiday) >>> + https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/929 - this one is all set >> afaik >>> and just needs to be merged to tp32 (jorge is handling that one) >>> + https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/939 - groovy dependency >> cleanup >>> - easy one >>> >>> Note that I removed PR 903 as it's slated for 3.4.0 at this point. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:46 PM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> we need to add TINKERPOP-2025 to this too: >>>> >>>> +TINKERPOP-2025 - which is related to the build - Kuppitz, i think you >> had >>>> said that you were looking at that one....don't think we can release >>>> without that >>>> + Open PRs <= 903 (maybe with the exception of 920) - of critical note >> to >>>> me is 922 - that's on the critical path to me >>>> + TINKERPOP-2019/TINKERPOP-2043 - Possible bugs in .NET >>>> + TINKERPOP-1906 - Make status messages/attributes from the server more >>>> available in .NET (maybe already done on TINKERPOP-1913 to some degree) >>>> + TINKERPOP-1972 - Two failing tests in .NET (I can't seem to get to the >>>> bottom of this one) >>>> >>>> I just closed out this: >>>> >>>> + TINKERPOP-2030 - Bug in Java driver around keep-alive >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 7:47 AM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So, it seems like we're good to push off 3.4.0 for a bit. Let's look to >>>>> do the 3.4.0-rc2 for .NET next week - any volunteers to handle that? >>>>> >>>>> As for 3.2.10 and 3.3.4 code freeze, perhaps we look to do that in two >>>>> weeks October 5 which would give us a release around the week of >> October >>>>> 15. If that's agreeable then please raise any issue that are thought >> to be >>>>> important for release so that we can track them here. Here's a few of >>>>> concern: >>>>> >>>>> + Open PRs <= 903 (maybe with the exception of 920) - of critical note >> to >>>>> me is 922 - that's on the critical path to me >>>>> + TINKERPOP-2030 - Bug in Java driver around keep-alive >>>>> + TINKERPOP-2019/TINKERPOP-2043 - Possible bugs in .NET >>>>> + TINKERPOP-1906 - Make status messages/attributes from the server more >>>>> available in .NET (maybe already done on TINKERPOP-1913 to some degree) >>>>> + TINKERPOP-1972 - Two failing tests in .NET (I can't seem to get to >> the >>>>> bottom of this one) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:33 PM Stephen Mallette < >> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Given the importance of TINKERPOP-1913 for the CosmosDB community, I >>>>>> think we should consider pushing out a 3.4.0-rc2 for .NET. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:10 AM Robert Dale <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Robert Dale >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:13 AM Jorge Bay Gondra < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I agree we should start looking at timelines for 3.2.10 and 3.3.4 >> and >>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>> bother yet with a 3.4 release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> El mar., 18 sept. 2018 a las 1:51, Stephen Mallette (< >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've been floating around "end of summer" for a release time frame >>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> some >>>>>>>>> time now. Well, end of summer is basically here and I feel like >>>>>>> 3.4.0 >>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>> needs work. I feel like we should give it a bit more time to >>>>>>> develop and >>>>>>>>> then give it some fresh consideration in the next couple of months. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That said, 3.2.10 and 3.3.4 have a lot of good bug fixes and minor >>>>>>>>> features. Perhaps those shouldn't be delayed any further. Maybe we >>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>> look to code freeze in next few weeks on those branches and >>>>>>> release. Then >>>>>>>>> we could do a smaller 3.2.11 and 3.3.5 when 3.4.0 feels more ready. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anyway any concerns about heading down that direction? >>>>>>>>> >>
