[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16631836#comment-16631836
]
Robert Dale commented on TINKERPOP-2051:
----------------------------------------
Just want to clarify scope here. We originally discussed TinkerGraph. Is the
current thought that this is a graph implementation requirement? I ask because
the ticket has component `structure` and [~spmallette]'s comment applies to
providers and users. So I'm a little fuzzy on if this is only a TinkerGraph
issue and/or Graph Provider issue.
I don't see a mention of any - vertex, edge, vertex property, etc - ID
requirements on the [Provider
Docs|http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.3.3/dev/provider/#_provider_documentation]
or [Reference Docs|http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.3.3/reference/]. These
should probably be improved to include the importance of unique IDs in any case.
> Uniqueness of property ids
> --------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2051
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2051
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: structure
> Affects Versions: 3.2.9
> Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz
> Priority: Major
> Labels: breaking
>
> Right now we don't ensure property id uniqueness. As shown in [this
> discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e28d61e1f3b674b617765a0f28174d45691db0812e7c56761d1456c3@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E],
> this can lead to very odd results, hence I marked this ticket as a Bug.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
