> I'm personally in favor of simply disabling this bot. + 1
> Should we wait 72h in case someone has good arguments for keeping everything as is? +1 Thank you for handling this administrative task Florian....appreciate that. On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:10 PM Florian Hockmann <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, I just asked on #asfinfra whether there are any requirements from > the ASF for keeping the bot and Daniel Gruno responded: > > > [5:58 PM] Daniel Gruno (humbedooh): you don't need a JIRA copy if you > > don't want it > > [5:59 PM] Daniel Gruno (humbedooh): or you can just have it appended > > to the worklog > > [6:04 PM] Daniel Gruno (humbedooh): from our side of the pond, as long > > as one copy of the discussion hits the ML, we're good > > [6:05 PM] Daniel Gruno (humbedooh): worklog is a workaround where it > > hits JIRA without sending an email to the ML > > So, we can decide on our own whether we want to disable it or we could > also us this workload as a comprise, although I don't know if that > provides much value for us. > > I'm personally in favor of simply disabling this bot. We would still get > everything on the dev list and everyone can read the original comments > on GitHub. Should we wait 72h in case someone has good arguments for > keeping everything as is? > > Am 08.10.2018 um 17:54 schrieb Stephen Mallette: > > i tend to find it distracting myself. not sure about anyone else. also > not > > sure if it's an option to change, but i guess i'd be in favor of > disabling > > that portion of the integration if it could be. > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 11:51 AM Florian Hockmann <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > >> If the only requirement from the ASF is that everything ends up on the > >> mailing list, then that should already be met by GitBox which sends us > >> the comments via mail. The additional bot only creates them as comments > >> on JIRA issues which are then sent again via mail from JIRA. > >> So, I don't see where we might miss anything on the mailing list if we > >> simply disable the copying of GitHub comments into JIRA issues. GitHub > >> comments that aren't linked to a JIRA issue still end up on dev through > >> BitBox. We only lose the comments in JIRA. But does anyone actually want > >> to read comments in JIRA that are copied over from GitHub? > >> > >> Am 08.10.2018 um 17:28 schrieb Stephen Mallette: > >>> That's an interesting tangle - ultimately, Apache requires those > comments > >>> to end up here on the mailing list and I wonder if that's just > >> unavoidable. > >>> Like we get the copy from GitHub to dev and then it also has to post to > >>> JIRA which then notifies dev too. I guess the issue is that GitHub > >> comments > >>> don't always tie to JIRA and perhaps the automation isn't smart enough > to > >>> differentiate that. You could ask about it on #infra i guess or if > gruno > >> is > >>> still following the thread, perhaps he'll comment. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 11:22 AM Florian Hockmann < > [email protected] > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Can't we now also disable the ASF GitHub Bot that copies all PR > comments > >>>> to the linked JIRA issue since GitBox already sends us those comments > >>>> via this mailing list? Would be great if we wouldn't get each comment > in > >>>> two separate mails anymore. Or do we really want to have all comments > >>>> also in JIRA? > >>>> > >>>> Am 08.10.2018 um 17:07 schrieb Stephen Mallette: > >>>>> Note that I've asked Infra to shut off GitHub issues/projects since > >> we're > >>>>> not using them. It's crazy how fast people started using that once it > >> was > >>>>> enable.....like people were just sitting on their keyboards waiting > to > >>>>> create issues. crazy > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:10 AM Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> And this has now been done. > >>>>>> Y'all should visit https://gitbox.apache.org/ and click on the > 'Link > >>>>>> GitHub and ASF accounts' thing and link your ASF accounts so you can > >> get > >>>>>> write access to github. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You may use the following new URLs for the tinkerpop repo: > >>>>>> - https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tinkerpop.git > >>>>>> - [email protected]:apache/tinkerpop.git > >>>>>> > >>>>>> With regards, > >>>>>> Daniel. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2018/10/05 14:14:48, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>> After some problems with pushes to Apache Git (weird slowness and > >>>>>>> "demultiplexer" problems) I contacted Apache Infra. In the midst of > >>>>>> working > >>>>>>> things through with Daniel Gruno he asked again if we'd like to go > to > >>>>>>> GitBox. Well, after a few IM exchanges, I learned that there's even > >>>> less > >>>>>>> change and impact to the community than we thought to make this > move. > >>>>>>> Basically, they just give us write access to the existing GitHub > >>>>>>> repo.....................ugh (wish i'd understood that a long time > >>>> ago). > >>>>>>> Anyway, as there were no objections in the past to making this move > >> and > >>>>>> we > >>>>>>> were just looking for the right time to do it, I went ahead and > >> created > >>>>>>> this: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17109 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Let's get it done...... > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > > >
