I think the name used in the providers <http://tinkerpop.apache.org/providers.html> section "TinkerPop-Enabled Graph Systems" is clear. An alternative would be "Gremlin-Enabled Graph Systems".
El mar., 16 oct. 2018 a las 4:11, Robert Dale (<[email protected]>) escribió: > I like the name but not entirely sure I'm on the same page. JanusGraph is > not remote-only. I didn't think DSE Graph was remote-only either. > > I'm also for naming normalization across the TinkerPop. Here are some other > names out there: > Graph Systems - http://tinkerpop.apache.org/#graph-systems > Graph Database > TinkerPop-Enabled Providers - http://tinkerpop.apache.org/providers.html > Data System Providers - > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/providers.html#data-system-providers > TinkerPop-Enabled Graph Systems > Graph Provider > > > Robert Dale > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 1:35 PM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm trying to come up with a name to describe graph providers like > Neptune, > > CosmosDB, DSE Graph, IBM Compose JanusGraph, etc. I've been calling them > > "server graphs" because they are "remote" only. They just accept Gremlin > as > > a request and return results. I don't really like "server graphs" though > - > > how does a "Gremlin Service Provider" sound? anyone have better ideas? > > >
