> One other idea in general for the change in this issue: What if we rename > AnonymousTraversalSource
well, the idea is to construct the `TraversalSource` in an anonymous fashion (i.e. without a graph or remote) so putting `Graph` back in the mix doesn't seem right to me even if called statically. out of necessity i placed `traversal()` on `Graph` in js/python but with C# being the most analogous to Java in terms of project structure I feel less happy about doing so here. I'd be ok with the other idea of just going with `Traversal()` and referencing the full name only as needed in the tests given that the problem only happens when "Traversal" is in the package name. [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/968 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
