[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16681699#comment-16681699
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2059:
-------------------------------------------
dkuppitz closed pull request #986: TINKERPOP-2059 Modulation of valueMap()
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/986
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Modulation of valueMap()
> ------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2059
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2059
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.3.3
> Reporter: stephen mallette
> Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz
> Priority: Major
> Labels: breaking
> Fix For: 3.4.0
>
>
> Allow for modulation of the {{valueMap()}} step with {{by()}} and possibly
> {{with()}} to make it's usage more flexible and consistent. The problem
> presented in relation to this change is how to easily unwrap the general
> multi-property structure of {{valueMap()}}
> {code}
> g.V().has('person','name','marko').
> valueMap('name','age').
> by(unfold())
> {code}
> which would yield: {{[name:marko,age:29]}} rather than:
> {{[name:[marko],age:[29]]}}. Obviously the {{by()}} is just a map over the
> values in the list of values returned from properties.
> Please see the
> [DISCUSS|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/91a3c980b5968c78638383dfa11f44ee14fc114ddc3d29e762e56f1f@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E]
> thread for additional thoughts on the matter to consider.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
