Do you have a scenario in mind where providers would construct a new `ReferenceElement` step? I don't think it's necessary and I guess if you would have thought of such a scenario, you wouldn't have nested the class inside `ReferenceElementStrategy`; hence I think `ReferenceElement` constructor can be package-private.
Anyway, since this is just a minor thing ... VOTE +1 [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1010 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
