Can't you just use HEAD?
git shortlog -sn 3.2.10..HEAD
Robert Dale
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 7:11 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> All PRs appear merged....I've starting the release process beginning with
> 3.2.11. Should see VOTE threads coming soon.
>
> Separately, I already found a problem with using git shortlog to generate
> the "contributor list" as there is no 3.2.11 tag to use in the arguments
> given to it. It's a bit of a cart before the horse problem. I will come up
> with something else to deal with that. Probably related to the website
> which can be updated out of band with the release. Just wanted to point out
> the problem so that no one would be expecting to see that content in the
> release notes when the VOTE threads go out.
>
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 8:31 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't know what is going on but yesterday i spent a few minutes messing
> > with the failing python build with radish and after a few failures it
> just
> > started working again locally. Then I re-ran failed travis jobs and they
> > started passing. I guess the problem was fixed externally - weird. I
> > expect to start the release process soon - there are just a couple more
> > longstanding PRs to merge that delayed a little during the holiday
> period.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 6:10 PM Daniel Kuppitz <m...@gremlin.guru> wrote:
> >
> >> A quick & dirty fix for the broken radish libs to at least get a clean
> >> build in docker:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/docker/scripts/build.sh b/docker/scripts/build.sh
> >> index e172ddaaa9..8b56cf53c3 100755
> >> --- a/docker/scripts/build.sh
> >> +++ b/docker/scripts/build.sh
> >> *@@ -78,7 +78,10 @@* if [ -r "settings.xml" ]; then
> >> cp settings.xml ~/.m2/
> >> fi
> >>
> >> *-mvn clean install process-resources ${TINKERPOP_BUILD_OPTIONS} || exit
> >> 1*
> >> *+mvn clean install -DskipTests*
> >> *+sed -i 's/background=background,/background=background/g'
> >>
> >>
> gremlin-python/target/python2/env/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/radish/parser.py*
> >> *+*
> >> +mvn install process-resources ${TINKERPOP_BUILD_OPTIONS} || exit 1
> >> [ -z "${BUILD_JAVA_DOCS}" ] || mvn process-resources -Djavadoc || exit
> 1
> >>
> >> if [ ! -z "${BUILD_USER_DOCS}" ]; then
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 6:18 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi all, just checking in during the holiday period. My laptop will
> >> return
> >> > to the off position shortly, but I wanted to point out that we seem to
> >> have
> >> > a problem with Python:
> >> >
> >> > https://travis-ci.org/apache/tinkerpop/jobs/472444735
> >> >
> >> > every current PR seems to be in fail mode right now. We will want to
> >> sort
> >> > that out before release.Looks like something in radish. If anyone can
> >> have
> >> > a look this week that would be helpful as I won't have time to dig on
> it
> >> > too deeply until next week (which is when we are supposed to be
> >> releasing).
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 7:09 AM Stephen Mallette <
> spmalle...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > While I think we could go on for every adding things to 3.4.0 I
> think
> >> > it's
> >> > > time to cut it off and release. There's too many good things in
> there
> >> to
> >> > > hold for any longer. We are looking at releasing 3.2.11, 3.3.5 and
> >> 3.4.0.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'd propose we polish up remaining items this week, set for code
> >> freeze
> >> > > 12/22 and then build the release for VOTE the week of the 31st. I
> >> assume
> >> > > that there are enough PMC members around the holiday period to VOTE
> on
> >> > the
> >> > > release artifacts. If the VOTE has to stay open a bit longer than is
> >> > > typical then that's ok. I'm happy to just do all three releases
> myself
> >> > this
> >> > > time as it might be hard to coordinate with others during the
> holiday
> >> > > period.
> >> > >
> >> > > We still have a number of important things to finish - specifically:
> >> > >
> >> > > 1. code reviews on open PRs with ids > 1000
> >> > > 2. finish up the GraphBinary - jorge is adding two more serializers
> >> and
> >> > > then i think we can call this a day and put it up for review.
> >> > > 3. documentation review
> >> > > 4. anything else?
> >> > >
> >> > > As usual, let's continue to use this thread for release coordination
> >> > > heading into code freeze.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
