[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
stephen mallette reassigned TINKERPOP-2136: ------------------------------------------- Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz Affects Version/s: 3.3.5 Priority: Minor (was: Trivial) Component/s: process > Inside lower bound inclusion (documentation) > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: TINKERPOP-2136 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2136 > Project: TinkerPop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: process > Affects Versions: 3.3.5 > Reporter: Martijn Dwars > Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz > Priority: Minor > > On [http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/#has-step] there is an > example: > {code:java} > g.V().has('age',inside(20,30)).values('age') // 1 > {code} > with the comment: > {code:java} > Find all vertices whose ages are between 20 (inclusive) and 30 (exclusive). > {code} > But if I run this in the Gremlin Groovy shell I see: > {code:java} > gremlin> g.V().has('age', inside(10, 30)).toString() > ==>[GraphStep(vertex,[]), HasStep([age.and(gt(10), lt(30))])] > {code} > which means the lower bound and upper bound are both exclusive. In > particular, the lower bound is exclusive, _not_ inclusive. Right? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)