Perhaps it should be replaced with `Objects.requireNonNull(...)` then.
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1043 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
Perhaps it should be replaced with `Objects.requireNonNull(...)` then.
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1043 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]