not sure - this is going to gremlin-core so having a non-standard repo might 
mess with things like grape/plugins maybe. i wasn't 100% sure we'd use the 
RedHat thing...i figured it would take a bit of thought/discussion. 

of course, without something like the RedHat artifact, the version stays stuck 
with the security problem along 3.3.x and 3.4.x unless we choose to accept a 
major breaking change in either of those lines. i still don't know when we want 
to allow for such things (i.e. take a major breaking change to fix a security 
problem). i guess it's done on a case-by-case basis perhaps - so, is the 
seriousness of this commons-configuration issue enough to force us to bump 
3.3.x and 3.4.x or can it wait for 3.5.x?

[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1086 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]

Reply via email to