**Discussion** If I understand the code correctly, looks like the current code could not look up the superclass serializer correctly.
For example, `InetAddress` is the superclass of `Inet4Address`, `Inet6Address`. If we remove the registry entry of `Inet4Adress` and `Inet6Address`, it could not redirect and lookup the serializer registered by the superclass (i.e. `InetAddress`) when we try to get the serializer for `Inet4Address` and `Inet6Address`. To resolve that, I would like to propose the changes in this PR: If the serializer of the input class type is not found, try and see if there is a serializer registered with its superclass. [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1180 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
