> Should we maybe rename the inactive release branches (3.0-dev - 3.2-dev) to > avoid confusion?
i'd say that most of the time, the problem is folks heading straight to `master` with their PR rather than to an older dev branch so i'm not sure we have a problem with inactive branches at this point. imo, i'd just leave them named as they are until we have a consistent problem with it. [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1256 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for [email protected]
