[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17193605#comment-17193605
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2417:
-------------------------------------------

spmallette commented on pull request #1326:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1326#issuecomment-690262834


   Thanks - cherry-picked to 3.4-dev and merged to master: 
947c97a420e956944e97322149fc2150ef1981f0


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> Add possibility to supply io step with InputStream instead of a file path
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2417
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2417
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: io
>            Reporter: Oleksandr Porunov
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently it is possible to supply *io* step with file path to read a file 
> from file system.
> It would be very convenient if we would be able to read files from input 
> stream instead of file path. 
> For example, it could look something like:
> *g.io(graphSonInputStream).with(IO.reader, IO.graphson).read().iterate()*
> Of course it wouldn't work as expected if we would use *write* instead of 
> read here because we won't be able to write to the input stream. Thus, we can 
> fail fast if the user supplied an input stream into the *io* step but tried 
> to use *write*.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to