[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Stephen Mallette updated TINKERPOP-2528:
----------------------------------------
    Component/s:     (was: translator)
                 sparql
          Flags:   (was: Important)
     Issue Type: Improvement  (was: Bug)
         Labels:   (was: index match sparql)

> Improve match() step to generate traversals that uses indexes
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2528
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2528
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sparql
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.10
>            Reporter: Marco Valzelli
>            Priority: Major
>
> Within this issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2325
> it has been tried to fix the behavior of the SPARQL component, to generate 
> traversals that uses the defined indexes.
> In this issue's discussion it became clear that the real fix was deeper, in 
> the match() step.
> In fact [~spmallette] in the github thread wrote:
> "It made me wonder if we should try to simply optimize {{match()}} better so 
> that it gives providers a better chance at using an index...in that way we 
> get improvements to {{match()}} for native usage and to sparql-gremlin and 
> other language compilers. As I mentioned previously, we'll create new JIRA 
> issues as needed for these improvements going forward." 
> ([https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1237#issuecomment-580747001)]
> So I open this issue to ask for the implementation of this improvements to 
> the {{match()}} step, for native usage,  sparql-gremlin component and other 
> language compilers.
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to