[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17302755#comment-17302755
]
Dan Snoddy commented on TINKERPOP-2534:
---------------------------------------
To replace log4j, we have to repackage and I'm not clear on what licensing
allows us to do.
> Log4j flagged as critical security violation
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2534
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2534
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: console, server
> Affects Versions: 3.4.10
> Reporter: Dan Snoddy
> Priority: Major
>
> Gremlin server and console include log4j 1.2, which end-of-life'd > 5 years
> ago.
> Security scanning software (twistlock), flags log4j 1.2 as a critical
> security violation, and hence prohibits deployment.
> CRITICAL:
> Attack complexity: low,Attack vector: network,Critical severity,Remote
> execution
> CVE-2019-17571
> [+https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-17571+]
> {color:#000000}Included in Log4j 1.2 is a SocketServer class that is
> vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data which can be exploited to
> remotely execute arbitrary code when combined with a deserialization gadget
> when listening to untrusted network traffic for log data. This affects Log4j
> versions up to 1.2 up to 1.2.17.{color}
>
> Is there a plan to remove log4j 1.2 so that installation of either gremlin
> server or console do not include the jars that trigger this security issue?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
