I am happy to help. The area I have been closest too is probably the enhancements to the Python client. I could write something around those features.
Cheers, Kelvin > On Apr 30, 2021, at 04:30, f...@florian-hockmann.de wrote: > > I could write something for .NET. Added GraphBinary support and switching > the JSON library could be interesting for some Gremlin.Net users. > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. April 2021 21:32 > An: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Betreff: Re: 3.5.0 Announcement Volunteers > > Right now, I think it's fine for these to just have each person's individual > style - might make the posts more interesting assuming we get a few more > volunteers. If you can come up with a neat image that could go with a tweet > to promote the announcement (that we will push through the TinkerPop > account), that would be cool. We've not really come up with anything that > sort of iconifies the gremlin-language module, so if you feel like thinking > about that, that would be neat. > > > >> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 2:45 PM Joshua Shinavier <j...@fortytwo.net> wrote: >> >> Sounds good. I'll write the announcement. If you have thoughts on the >> format, please feel free to share. >> >> Josh >> >> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:56 AM Stephen Mallette >> <spmalle...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 1:38 PM Joshua Shinavier <j...@fortytwo.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I would be happy to collaborate on gremlin-language if there is >> something >>>> which needs doing. >>>> >>>> Josh >>>> >>>> >>> great josh - thanks! The upgrade docs sorta tuck that feature away >>> in the provider section >>> >>> >> https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.5.0-SNAPSHOT/upgrade/#_gremlin_lan >> guage >>> >>> because at this point it doesn't have direct user impact, but i >>> think it might be useful to the community to write something in an >>> announcement >> that >>> helps describe what this module lays the foundation for. you've had >>> some interesting ideas in this area that i'm not sure have gotten >>> outside of >> the >>> dev list as of yet. >>> >> >
