Do we have an overview anywhere of which branches are frozen at any given time? I have been assuming branches were automatically opened once their releases were done, but I see now that that is not necessarily the case😅 Searching through the mailing list to figure out which branches are frozen can be cumbersome, especially if we are not diligent about always informing about it when a branch is open again.
tir. 18. jan. 2022 kl. 13:00 skrev Stephen Mallette <[email protected]>: > There's a fair bit of work happening on 3.5-dev right now. It's probably > best to not slow down anyone's momentum on that to hold 3.5-dev frozen. If > we have to do a small 3.5.3 release alongside 3.6.0 to ensure functional > parity I guess that's fine. I think we can reopen 3.5-dev again. Please let > me know if there are any concerns. > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:39 PM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi folks, I've been away for a bit during the holiday but back now > > thinking about this release. The issue for 3.4-dev that made me want to > > hold release was resolved. The fix had nothing to do with the code itself > > and more to do with the fact that memory requirements for the tests we'd > > added over the years seemed to have quietly reached a point where they > were > > sometimes exceeding the memory available of the GH Actions instances > > running them. After a bit of profiling Maven executions (something I've > > never had to do ever) I was able to pretty drastically reduce the memory > > consumption and now everything works smoothly. > > > > There is one PR out there that should be merged for 3.4-dev (it's been > > open for a while pending the CI problem): > > > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1534 > > > > and will try to get that done immediately. As I'm not aware of any other > > work, for 3.5-dev and 3.4-dev I think we can proceed as if this were code > > freeze week and move to release. I think we should hold on release 3.6.0 > > and continue to land PRs on master during the release process and then > keep > > the freeze on 3.5-dev until 3.6.0 is out the door (recall that 3.4-dev is > > basically retired now). Please let me know if there are concerns. > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 2:05 PM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I think we will need to take a bit of a delay on the code freeze for > this > >> Friday. 3.4-dev is unstable in CI - i've been trying to get to the root > of > >> the problem for a week now and it's still not completely resolved. > That's > >> prevented me from looking at other issues I wanted to get done and I > think > >> that there is definitely some outstanding work from folks who are off > for > >> the holidays. So, let's revisit code freeze a week from now and see > where > >> things are. Thanks! > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 3:37 PM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> In the worst case, if there were things we wanted added to 3.6.0 that > >>> weren't quite ready for code freeze we could release 3.5.2 and hold the > >>> freeze on its branch while 3.6.0 finished. I just wouldn't want a > 3.6.0 to > >>> force a few commits into a fast turnaround release of 3.5.3. That might > >>> give some buffer if we wanted, but it would be nice if it could all > just > >>> land at once. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 3:07 PM Kelvin Lawrence > <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> The work for adding a regex TextP is sitting on the TINKERPOP-2652 > >>>> branch. I still need to write the docs and add one last Java test but > >>>> otherwise it's close to PR ready. I would like to try and get that > into 3.6 > >>>> which I think I should be able to do before the cutoff. > >>>> In general capturing what we have now into a set of releases makes > >>>> sense to start the year with a pretty clean mainline branch that we > can > >>>> iterate on. > >>>> Kelvin > >>>> > >>>> On Monday, December 13, 2021, 06:44:46 AM CST, Stephen Mallette < > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to propose we do a release for the new year, with code > freeze > >>>> starting conveniently on Friday December 31. > >>>> > >>>> I think we should also consider making this the last release of 3.4.x. > >>>> > >>>> It occurred to me that 3.6.x doesn't have a name yet. Working in > reverse > >>>> (never done it this way before), I have a Victorian/Steampunk sorta > >>>> Gremlin > >>>> image that could be used for a logo, and searching around for related > >>>> music > >>>> came across a whole genre of Steampunk Music. First artist group I > >>>> clicked > >>>> on, Deus Ex Vapore Machina, has a song called "Tinkerheart" - sorta > just > >>>> fits I'd say. > >>>> > >>> > >>> >
