[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17550945#comment-17550945
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2708:
-------------------------------------------

spmallette commented on PR #1680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1680#issuecomment-1148538843

   > As this may be considered a breaking change, I added a change-log entry, 
are there additional docs I should edit?
   
   breaking changes are typically documented in the Upgrade Documentation so 
that we can call attention to important changes more easily with greater detail 
than the CHANGELOG - it is probably worth adding an item to say that this 
parameter no longer does anything and that you would want to call `open()` 
explicitly to "connect on startup". also, if it is a breaking change, there 
should be a "breaking" label on the JIRA. finally, i would assume the 
deprecation to be removed on merge to master for 3.7.0, so perhaps you should 
consider a follow-on PR to get rid of the warning message and parameter all 
together on that branch.
   
   separately, there is a merge commit in the history. could you please remove 
that? other than that VOTE +1




> unhandledRejection upon connection failure
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2708
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2708
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: javascript
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.2
>            Reporter: Jon Brede Skaug
>            Priority: Major
>
> In the Javascript driver  is unable to connect to the graph database for 
> whatever reason an unhandledRejection warning occurs.
> I have tested this with `new DriverRemoteConnection`
> This is a silent error and it won't be able to catch the error due to the way 
> it is handled.
> I've tracked it down to this line:
> [https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/c22c0141bb7a00f366f929d0e5d3c6379d1004e0/gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/lib/driver/connection.js#L156]
> h2. *Solution suggestion*
> A fairly quick solution (but possibly breaking change) to this is by not 
> opening the database in the constructor [(line reference 
> L105)|https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/c22c0141bb7a00f366f929d0e5d3c6379d1004e0/gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/lib/driver/connection.js#L105]
>  but instead forcing the user to run the `DriverRemoteConnection.open()` 
> after the constructor has been initialized. `DriverRemoteConnection.open()` 
> returns a promise which makes more sense and is a bit more intuitive. The 
> current error message gives an error about DNS which is increadibly confusing 
> without deepdiving into the Gremlin driver code and navigating through 3 
> classes to find the culprit. It's also an error which seems a bit more 
> harmless than it actually is. 
> It'salso  possible to set option.connectOnStartup to "false" by default, this 
> however will require the user to be aware of the possible failure upon 
> setting it to true. I believe forcing the user to run .open() after 
> initializing the class may be more robust. 
> By doing it this way the user can instead handle the error raised by 
> DriverRemoteConnection.open() by using promise.catch() or an async function 
> using await. Promise.catch() is as provided:
> {code:java}
> this.drc.open().catch(err => {
>     console.log("Unable to open connection to database", err);
> });{code}
> h2. *{{Temporary work around example}}*
>  
> {code:java}
> // Using promises
> const drc = new DriverRemoteConnection(url, {connectOnStartup: false}); 
> drc.open().catch(err => {
>    // Handle error upon open, i.e using retry and backoff logic, notify an 
> alarm system or setting a global variable to reject requests.
> });{code}
>  
> h2. *The issue with not handling the error properly:*
> Not handling the error properly means that if you pass in an invalid URL or 
> the gremlin compatible database is down, it won't be able to handle the 
> connection error before a transaction is attempted.
> In the future Node.js unhandledRejection will terminate the Node.js process. 
> This can cause critical failure of processes upon boot and may even cause 
> DDoS situations where processes may flood the gremlin compatible database 
> with connection attempts due to processes failing and being reinstated over 
> and over by a process monitor.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to