[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17558254#comment-17558254
]
Boxuan Li commented on TINKERPOP-2766:
--------------------------------------
Relevant thread:
[https://lists.apache.org/thread/q3d3oyvph4d57bbnorj7dyfww5hjyn4y]
I can see why
{code:java}
addy.getAddress().getHostAddress(){code}
gets reverted to
{code:java}
addy.getHostName(){code}
[here|[https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1213/files#diff-bb8d767caf9f3f7d4070dc4ac564bba296c8e399b6a8782d953848b4cddb5a16R100],]
but I still think
{code:java}
InetAddress.getAllByName(address){code}
could have been retained.
> Poor load-balancing with java driver
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2766
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2766
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Boxuan Li
> Priority: Major
>
> As reported
> [here|[https://lists.lfaidata.foundation/g/janusgraph-users/message/6544],]
> load balancing is poor when using the java driver.
> Relevant code:
> [https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/5438925e6be3ec8df7e04a2fd232fda018232fe3/gremlin-driver/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/driver/Cluster.java#L956-L963]
>
> Instead of
> {code:java}
> InetAddress.getByName(address){code}
> method, I believe we should use
> {code:java}
> InetAddress.getAllByName(address){code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
