Thanks Cole! There is actually one more piece of feature around parameterization with a few items to wrap up in the branch (https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/tree/gvalue). I'd like to at least get it into a PR before the code freeze is initiated, which will likely be early next week.
Cheers, Yang On 2024/11/20 01:59:42 Cole Greer wrote: > Hi Yang, > > Now that master-http has merged into master and it appears that the java and > python GLVs are stable, I think now is a good time to proceed with this > milestone. > Unless there are any objections, I would like to suggest we initiate code > freeze > in the master branch this Friday (November 22), for the purpose of a TinkerPop > 4.0.0m1 release. > > Please reply if you have any concerns. > > Thanks, > Cole > > From: Yang Xia <xia...@apache.org> > Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2024 at 1:00 PM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org <dev@tinkerpop.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release of a Milestone Build for TinkerPop 4.0 > Yeah, I think that makes sense to do so for tx(). > > Also, given there are no further comments or feedback, I'll assume lazy > consensus for having a TP4.0 milestone release as user preview. > > Cheers, > > Yang > > On 2024/10/10 16:56:19 Ken Hu wrote: > > Looking through the master-http branch, it seems like transactions aren't > > ready yet. It might be best to disable tx() and other similar functions > > just so users aren't confused in that case. So maybe just throw an > > exception in those cases? > > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 5:51 PM Yang Xia <xia...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > As we get closer towards the end of the year, a lot of changes have been > > > implemented for 4.0 in the master-http branch. While there is still a lot > > > to do before we are ready for a full 4.0 release, it would be good to > > > release a milestone build of what is done so far to gather feedback. > > > > > > This milestone would roughly offer the opportunity to try Gremlin Server > > > HTTP with the revised GraphSON and GraphBinary serialization formats for > > > this version, using Java and Python drivers. These drivers will initially > > > continue to support GraphSON as it can help with debugging (given its > > > human > > > readable format) and offers wider serialization options for users in these > > > early days, though, as mentioned in previous posts, we should expect to > > > just have GraphBinary support for drivers in the future for simplicity. > > > > > > Also, as this is a “milestone” release, we should consider it an official > > > one as opposed to a SNAPSHOT or dev release candidate. Please respond if > > > you have any thoughts on this. If there is no feedback by October 11th, I > > > will assume a lazy consensus in favour of such a milestone release. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Yang > > > > > >
