[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17901259#comment-17901259
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2959:
-------------------------------------------
vkagamlyk commented on code in PR #2919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2919#discussion_r1858930371
##########
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/P.java:
##########
@@ -74,7 +77,16 @@ public void setValue(final V value) {
@Override
public boolean test(final V testValue) {
- return this.biPredicate.test(testValue, this.value);
+ if (this.value instanceof GValue) {
Review Comment:
I think this piece of code will be repeated many times, it is better to make
a static method somewhere
> Allow the grammar to support parameters
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2959
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2959
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: language
> Affects Versions: 3.6.4
> Reporter: Stephen Mallette
> Assignee: Stephen Mallette
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.7.0
>
>
> Allow the grammar to support parameters similar to how the groovy engine does
> like, {{g.inject(x,y,z)}}. Doing this will make it easier for a transition
> away from the groovy engine as a lot of Gremlin in the world today uses
> parameters. The grammar may have to come with some limitations though as
> groovy is wide open in terms of what can be treated as a variable. Probably
> going to keep parameters tied to primitives, collections and tokens/enums
> like {{Order}} and {{Scope}}. Collections themselves will not contain
> parameters and things like a {{Traversal}} or {{P}} cannot be treated as one.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
