[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17901986#comment-17901986
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2959:
-------------------------------------------

andreachild commented on code in PR #2919:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2919#discussion_r1863938477


##########
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/dsl/graph/GraphTraversal.java:
##########
@@ -2388,14 +2879,39 @@ public default GraphTraversal<S, E> hasId(final Object 
id, final Object... other
                 // as ids are unrolled when it's in array, they should also be 
unrolled when it's a list.
                 // this also aligns with behavior of hasId() when it's pushed 
down to g.V() (TINKERPOP-2863)
                 ids.addAll((Collection<?>) id);
-            } else
+            } else {
                 ids.add(id);
+            }
 
             // unrolling ids from lists works cleaner with Collection too, as 
otherwise they will need to
             // be turned into array first
             if (otherIds != null) {
                 for (final Object i : otherIds) {
-                    if (id instanceof Object[]) {
+                    // to retain existing behavior, GValue's containing 
collections are unrolled by 1 layer.
+                    // For example, GValue.of([1, 2]) is processed to 
[GValue.of(1), GValue.of(2)]
+                    if(i instanceof GValue) {
+                        Object value = ((GValue) i).get();
+                        if (i instanceof Object[]) {

Review Comment:
   Is `i` supposed to be `value`?





> Allow the grammar to support parameters
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-2959
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2959
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: language
>    Affects Versions: 3.6.4
>            Reporter: Stephen Mallette
>            Assignee: Stephen Mallette
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.7.0
>
>
> Allow the grammar to support parameters similar to how the groovy engine does 
> like, {{g.inject(x,y,z)}}. Doing this will make it easier for a transition 
> away from the groovy engine as a lot of Gremlin in the world today uses 
> parameters. The grammar may have to come with some limitations though as 
> groovy is wide open in terms of what can be treated as a variable. Probably 
> going to keep parameters tied to primitives, collections and tokens/enums 
> like {{Order}} and {{Scope}}. Collections themselves will not contain 
> parameters and things like a {{Traversal}} or {{P}} cannot be treated as one.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to