Hi everyone, All of the JIRAs I previously highlighted have been closed (with the exception of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3161 which after further consideration I believe is better suited for 3.8). As there were no objections to the previously proposed release timeline, I would like to call the start of a 7 day code freeze on 3.7-dev. As always updates to documentation and minor tweaks may still be permitted in the branch.
Please take this time to review the documentation and conduct any testing which may be necessary prior to the release. Thanks, Cole On 2025/07/17 01:35:07 Cole Greer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I wanted to officially start release discussions for 3.7.4. I have been > holding off on this discussion > with the intention of proposing a joint 3.7.4/3.8.0 release, however I > believe we are overdue for > 3.7.4 and it’s now best to proceed with it on its own. > > I’ve seen requests for this release from Kyle Boyer in discord > (https://discord.com/channels/838910279550238720/1377747792344121404/1377747792344121404) > and from Daniel Weber in GitHub > (https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/2992#issuecomment-3028646798) > > The full list of accumulated changes can be found in the changelog > (https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.7-dev/CHANGELOG.asciidoc). > > I would like to see the following few JIRAs hammered out before the release, > but I don’t think any of > them need a significant amount of time. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3141 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3142 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3138 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3160 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3161 > > I would like to aim to initiate code freeze on 3.7-dev on July 25 if there > are no objections. Please > let me know any thoughts you have on this release timeline as well as if > there are any outstanding > issues you are working on which you would like included in the release. > > One final note, I don’t think 3.8.0 is that far away at this point. If we > proceed as proposed here, we can discuss once > 3.8.0 is ready if it should launch on its own or be accompanied by a small > 3.7.5 release. > > Thanks, > Cole >
