[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18011273#comment-18011273
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-3178:
-------------------------------------------

Cole-Greer commented on PR #3170:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3170#issuecomment-3141105290

   VOTE +1




> Clarify choose() with consistent semantics
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-3178
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3178
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: process
>    Affects Versions: 3.7.3
>            Reporter: Stephen Mallette
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: breaking
>
> h3. Match only a single case in {{choose()}}
> {code}
> gremlin> g.V().hasLabel('person').choose(values('age')).option(27, 
> constant('x')).option(27, constant('y')).option(none, constant('z'))
> ==>z
> ==>x
> ==>y
> ==>z
> ==>z
> {code}
> There should be only 4 results above, one for each person, but {{choose}} is 
> matching twice on 27.  {{choose}} should match the first item it finds only 
> and no fall through. 
> h3. Consistent behavior for unmatched inputs
> {code}
> // This passes through unmatched inputs
> g.V().choose(values('age'), values('age'))
> ==>29
> ==>27
> ==>v[3]
> ==>32
> ==>v[5]
> ==>35
> // This throws exception for unmatched inputs  
> g.V().choose(values('age')).option(27, out()).option(none, in()).path()
> The provided traverser does not map to a value: 
> v[3][TinkerVertex]->[PropertiesStep([age],value)][DefaultGraphTraversal] 
> parent[[TinkerGraphStep(vertex,[]), 
> ChooseStep([PropertiesStep([age],value)],[[none, [[VertexStep(IN,vertex), 
> EndStep]]], [(eq(27)), [VertexStep(OUT,vertex), EndStep]]]), PathStep]]
> {code}
> Change the switch form to behave like the if-then form.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to