Hi Stephen,
I’m happy to add a few extra days to code freeze. I haven’t had quite as much
time to work through the documentation as I would’ve liked, so I would
appreciate the short extension as well. I’ll pencil in Wednesday Nov. 5 as the
cutoff for building release artifacts and sending out the vote. Feel free to 
reach
out again if you’d like more time beyond that.

Thanks,
Cole

From: Stephen Mallette <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, October 31, 2025 at 4:08 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 3.8.0/3.7.5 Release

Normally, I think we'd expect to see release artifacts on Monday after a
code freeze. If it's ok with everyone, it would be helpful to get a few
extra days before building release artifacts. Still testing some things and
could use a bit more time to make sure everything looks good.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 1:50 PM Yang Xia <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you Cole and Andrea!
>
> On 2025/10/29 17:01:01 Cole Greer wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I’ve recently deployed the latest java snapshots to the snapshot repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/tinkerpop/
> ,
> > and the upgrade docs have also been published:
> https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.8.0-SNAPSHOT/upgrade/. I will
> continue to
> > redeploy snapshots and documentation throughout code freeze. Please feel
> free to try it out and get in touch with any feedback.
> >
> > Thanks Andrea for volunteering as an observer, I’d be happy to show you
> the release process. I will sync with you off-list to coordinate this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cole
> >
> > From: Andrea Child <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 at 10:08 AM
> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 3.8.0/3.7.5 Release
> > Hi Cole,
> > Thanks for volunteering as release manager for 3.8.0. If possible, I
> would like to participate as an observer to this release so that I can help
> for future releases. Please note that I also merged the prevent inject in
> repeat PR last night: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3253
> > Thanks,
> > Andrea
> >
> > From: Cole Greer <[email protected]>
> > Date: Monday, October 27, 2025 at 7:16 PM
> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 3.8.0/3.7.5 Release
> >
> > Hi Yang,
> >
> > Thanks for driving the code freeze here, I’d be happy to volunteer as
> release manager this time around.
> >
> > Regarding your PR list, I would also include Kirill Stepanishin’s PRs
> cleaning up the gremlin examples
> > as well as Kangwei Zhu’s flaky test fix PR.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cole
> >
> > From: Yang Xia <[email protected]>
> > Date: Monday, October 27, 2025 at 6:33 PM
> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] 3.8.0/3.7.5 Release
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As mentioned in the previous thread on releases, I'd like to initiate
> the code freeze on 3.7-dev and 3.8-dev, for the 3.7.5 maintenance release
> and the 3.8.0 major release.
> >
> > We have a lot of exciting new features coming in 3.8.0, so I'd like to
> invite folks to take the opportunity to try out the SNAPSHOT build.
> >
> > Within this code freeze period, we'll not be considering major PRs or
> new features, but will accept small non-breaking fixes and documentation
> updates, including these few PRs:
> >
> > * Prevent inject in repeat:
> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3253
> > * Remove GenericArgument from from() and to():
> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3252
> > * Fix tail inside repeat: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3248
> >
> > The VOTE threads could be expected starting November 3rd, and the
> releases would be expected within the same or the following week.
> >
> > If there are any objections to this timeline, or if there are any other
> desired changes before the release, please raise in this thread.
> >
> > In addition, if any committers and PMC members would like to be the
> release manager this time, please also reply to this thread.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Yang
> > Warning: The sender of this message could not be validated and may not
> be the actual sender.
> >
>
Warning: The sender of this message could not be validated and may not be the 
actual sender.

Reply via email to