[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18081961#comment-18081961
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-3244:
-------------------------------------------
codecov-commenter commented on PR #3430:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3430#issuecomment-4485441281
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3430?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)
Report
:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 75.37%. Comparing base
([`9b46b67`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/commit/9b46b6777d2fa250e41daacf2fa4554605aff53a?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache))
to head
([`4722890`](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/commit/4722890ed831ba4f71c3916b5e6eafcf85439345?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache)).
:warning: Report is 463 commits behind head on 3.7-dev.
<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>
```diff
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 3.7-dev #3430 +/- ##
=============================================
- Coverage 76.14% 75.37% -0.77%
- Complexity 13152 13161 +9
=============================================
Files 1084 1064 -20
Lines 65160 61883 -3277
Branches 7285 7391 +106
=============================================
- Hits 49616 46647 -2969
+ Misses 12839 12812 -27
+ Partials 2705 2424 -281
```
</details>
[:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by
Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3430?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it
here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).
<details><summary> :rocket: New features to boost your workflow: </summary>
- :snowflake: [Test
Analytics](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/test-analytics): Detect flaky tests,
report on failures, and find test suite problems.
- :package: [JS Bundle
Analysis](https://docs.codecov.com/docs/javascript-bundle-analysis): Save
yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
</details>
> Add next(n) batch iteration to gremlin-go for GLV parity
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-3244
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3244
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: driver
> Affects Versions: 3.7.5, 3.8.1
> Reporter: Taylor Riggan
> Priority: Minor
>
> The Java, Python, and .NET GLVs all support `next\(n\)` on Traversal to
> retrieve multiple results at once, but gremlin-go only supports single-item
> `Next()` returning `(*Result, error)`. This creates an API inconsistency
> across GLVs that makes it harder to write portable examples and documentation.
> Currently, users must manually collect results from `GetResultSet()` +
> `One()` in a loop to achieve the same behavior. A `Next(n int) ([]*Result,
> error)` method on `Traversal` would bring gremlin-go in line with the other
> GLVs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
