[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18131436#comment-18131436
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2774:
-------------------------------------------
masterhugo commented on PR #3527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3527#issuecomment-6386644566
No problem at all @kenhuuu, please take your time!
In the meantime, I've been exercising the async driver against real
workloads and fault-injection scenarios (concurrent traversals, node reboots,
and caller-side retry/backoff loops) to catch any remaining edge cases and keep
the async implementation as clean and solid as possible.
> Full async/await support in gremlin-python
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-2774
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2774
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: python
> Affects Versions: 3.5.3
> Reporter: Ken Hu
> Priority: Minor
>
> Recently, there have been multiple instances of users asking about issues
> with event loops and aiohttp. This discussion nearly always ends up with the
> user requesting for async/await support in gremlin-python. This means full
> compatibility with asyncio and not needing to use threads.
> Async/await support is also a feature that those using newer, asynchronous
> web frameworks are asking for as gremlin-python can be a performance
> bottleneck due to its lack of support for async/await.
> My intention is that we can use this issue as a means of gauging the interest
> from the community for this feature. If you are interested in having
> gremlin-python support async/await then please leave a comment below.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)
