Great, Then I won't be switching to Gremlin Server as production quite yet, but will do my best to create a C# client and share it with you.
Thanks, Effy On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 2:58:45 PM UTC+2, Stephen Mallette wrote: > > I don't expect any more changes to the protocol between now and GA. We > had good community discussion around the protocol itself and it seems very > robust to me at this point. The protocol itself hasn't changed in months > and there have been no additional proposals to make changes, so I think it > is pretty stable at this point. > > As far as "production-ready" goes, Gremlin Server isn't in production > anywhere that I know of, though I've heard of at least a few organizations > working towards putting it there. At this point, the focus on Gremlin > Server is bug-finding and performance enhancement, so in that sense I'd > call things "stable". There is the possibility of us adding one more > feature between now and GA, but it should not affect those building non-JVM > clients. Even for folks with a JVM client, the change will not be breaking > - it would just offer more opportunity to optimize their drivers. > > As a side note, in the future, we probably should have "driver > development" discussions/questions happen in the apache dev mailing list: > [email protected] <javascript:> > > Thanks, > > Stephen > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Daniel Kuppitz <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Hi Effy, >> >> you may find this useful: >> http://www.tinkerpop.com/docs/3.0.0.M7/#_developing_a_driver >> >> I guess the protocol definition is pretty much done in its current state >> and we won't see any changes soon. Stephen may correct me if my assumption >> is wrong. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Effy Teva <[email protected] >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've been using Rexster 2.6 for a while, and recently discovered >>> TinkerPop3. >>> First, is TinkerPop3 (Gremlin Server) considered stable for production? >>> Is it still going through major changes? >>> Second, I couldn't find any C# client for the Gremlin Server WebSockets >>> new protocol, and couldn't find the protocol definition, in order to build >>> a C# client. >>> >>> Is the protocol still going changes? Could anyone share the protocol >>> definition? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Effy >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Gremlin-users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/7a29ed3e-81b1-454b-9ce9-afdc6fd60c5b%40googlegroups.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/7a29ed3e-81b1-454b-9ce9-afdc6fd60c5b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Gremlin-users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/CA%2Bf9seWbJfyt6nJw0TAOTrinnDZcCrPrDdagH4K4np5GrLaofA%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gremlin-users/CA%2Bf9seWbJfyt6nJw0TAOTrinnDZcCrPrDdagH4K4np5GrLaofA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > >
