[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14483400#comment-14483400
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP3-509:
---------------------------------------------
[~okram] if TINKERPOP-498 was done, would the application of
{{SubgraphStrategy}} (or other decorative {{TraversalStrategy}}
implementations) satisfy this issue?
> Subgraph support for VertexProgram
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP3-509
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-509
> Project: TinkerPop 3
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Reporter: Bob Briody
>
> Most deployments contain graphs with a mix of:
> - system details
> - users & permissions
> - model data
> - instance data
> ...where each of these items represents a connected component.
> This makes a universal VertexProgram pretty unhelpful, since they should only
> be executed against a subset of the instance data, possibly defined by a set
> of edge labels or a Traversal.
> The framework should provide a mechanism to enable execution against a
> subgraph in an efficient way. Doing so should not require changes to
> VertexProgram code.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
