On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello mentors,
>
> Seems the [VOTE] has a single +0. What is the protocol? How do we move things 
> forward?
>

Generally, I recommend that folks keep a vote open on the dev list
unless its obvious that you aren't going to get votes for weeks.
Your project mentors are generally more friendly, and understand
things better than the IPMC at large. (ask me how I know ;) )

That said, you can't release until you have a enough positive binding
votes and more binding votes than not. (This also plays into how it
works post-graduation - a lot of times you will need to chase busy PMC
members to vote to be able to kick a release out.)

Your first release will also take a lot of time to review - that's the
hard one. In my experience that takes a minimum of two hours for each
of the mentors, and you have source and binaries; we're doing things
like auditing the signatures, hashes, auditing licenses, license
headers, ensuring that the source you tossed out actually matches what
is in git at the commit rev you referenced. We're also looking (as
James called out) for PPMC members to be demonstrating that they
understand what they should be checking from a policy and legal
perspective.

--David

Reply via email to