[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bryn Cooke closed TINKERPOP3-650.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Invalid
I think this had already been fixed in head before I raised this issue.
> Reconsider has step 'within' and 'inside' terminology
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP3-650
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-650
> Project: TinkerPop 3
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Reporter: Bryn Cooke
> Priority: Minor
>
> 'within' and 'inside' are confusing. They are practically interchangeable in
> British English. For instance:
> .has('time', within, [10, 50])
> //The runner had a time within 10 and 50 seconds
> Possibly we could use set theory terminology
> .has('time', intersects, [10, 50])
> //The runners time intersects the bag of [10,50]
> or get rid of the distinction altogether and just have in and not_in
> .has('time', IN, range(10, 50))
> .has('time', NOT_IN, range(10, 50))
> .has('time', IN, [10, 50])
> .has('time', NOT_IN, [10, 50])
> Give it a range and the query behaves as a range. Give it a collection and
> the query acts accordingly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
