[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14527001#comment-14527001
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP3-231:
---------------------------------------------
So what should we do? Is your conclusion that we can't performance test
traversals and steps with TinkerGraph at all? Do we just close this? Or is
there more we can explore to figure something out?
> Expand the PerformanceSuite
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP3-231
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-231
> Project: TinkerPop 3
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: test-suite
> Reporter: stephen mallette
> Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz
> Fix For: 3.0.0.GA
>
>
> We current have:
> https://github.com/tinkerpop/tinkerpop3/blob/master/gremlin-test/src/main/java/com/tinkerpop/gremlin/structure/StructurePerformanceSuite.java
> It doesn't do much - basic/simple tests for simple reads/writes. We should
> build this out for "traversal" oriented tests. Not sure if we want to have a
> {{ProcessPerformanceSuite}} for that or not. The model would be the same.
> This would be nice because it's then easy to check for performance
> regressions between branches, releases, etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
