that's a helpful command, daniel - could you add that to the README when you get a chance (and any other related options that might be helpful)?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi David, > > bin/process-docs.sh will process *all* *.asciidoc files. That includes 1 or > 2 files with Hadoop code samples, hence Hadoop must be running. > To avoid those checks and process only a single file, you can use this > command: > > docs/preprocessor/preprocess-file.sh > `pwd`/gremlin-console/target/apache-gremlin-console-*-standalone > `pwd`/docs/src/*xyz*.asciidoc > > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:33 PM, David Robinson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I am working off of the latest "master" and wanted to add a few changes > to > > the "Has Step" documentation in the the-traversal.asciidoc file. > > > > Following the README.asciidoc, it says this: > > * Build AsciiDocs: `bin/process-docs.sh` > > > > The process-docs.sh and related sh files around this were just updated in > > the past few hours and now require Hadoop to be running to rebuild the > > ascii docs ? > > > > Is it really true that to make a minor typo fix or an update to a > > non-hadoop specific step, that we now need to have Hadoop running on our > > development machine ? Or is there a new way to generate the documents > that > > I am not aware of ? > > > > This is the message I see when running process-docs.sh: > > >> Hadoop is not running, be sure to start it before processing the docs. > > > > If the new process really does require Hadoop, may I request that we not > do > > this or find a way to split up the traversal document so that non-Hadoop > > related updates don't require Hadoop to be running ? > > > > Thank you, > > >
