[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP3-751.
-----------------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix
      Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez

I don't think multi-properties should have plural key names. The convention 
espoused by TinkerPop3 is taken from the RDF world.

{code}
1--name-->marko
1--name-->mrodriguez
1--created-->2
1--created-->3
{code}

Like edges that go from vertex-to-vertex, vertex-to-literal "edges" are also 
singularly named.

> Vertex property docs use singular nouns for multi-properties
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP3-751
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-751
>             Project: TinkerPop 3
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Bryn Cooke
>            Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
>            Priority: Minor
>
> http://www.tinkerpop.com/docs/3.0.0-SNAPSHOT/#vertex-properties
> The current docs seem to suggest folks should use singular nouns for 
> properties in all circumstances. However in graph databases with schema this 
> will cause issues where people will find themselves with name clashes between 
> single and multi-property definitions.
> Perhaps write a section on naming conventions. For instance labels should be 
> the class of elements, properties should be singular-nouns, multi-properties 
> should be plural nouns?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to