[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP3-751. ----------------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez I don't think multi-properties should have plural key names. The convention espoused by TinkerPop3 is taken from the RDF world. {code} 1--name-->marko 1--name-->mrodriguez 1--created-->2 1--created-->3 {code} Like edges that go from vertex-to-vertex, vertex-to-literal "edges" are also singularly named. > Vertex property docs use singular nouns for multi-properties > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TINKERPOP3-751 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-751 > Project: TinkerPop 3 > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: documentation > Reporter: Bryn Cooke > Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez > Priority: Minor > > http://www.tinkerpop.com/docs/3.0.0-SNAPSHOT/#vertex-properties > The current docs seem to suggest folks should use singular nouns for > properties in all circumstances. However in graph databases with schema this > will cause issues where people will find themselves with name clashes between > single and multi-property definitions. > Perhaps write a section on naming conventions. For instance labels should be > the class of elements, properties should be singular-nouns, multi-properties > should be plural nouns? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)