[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14637760#comment-14637760
]
Matt Frantz commented on TINKERPOP3-779:
----------------------------------------
Good question. When the fix works, I can move it appropriately.
> coalesce should not forget path
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP3-779
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-779
> Project: TinkerPop 3
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-incubating
> Reporter: Matt Frantz
> Assignee: Matt Frantz
>
> It seems like the path along whichever branch of the {{coalesce}} step should
> be preserved downstream. In 3.0.0, this is not the case:
> {noformat}
> gremlin> g.V().out().out().path()
> ==>[v[1], v[4], v[5]]
> ==>[v[1], v[4], v[3]]
> gremlin> g.V().coalesce(out().out()).path()
> ==>[v[1], v[5]]
> ==>[v[1], v[3]]
> {noformat}
> I would expect the output of the second statement to equal the first.
> Also, to be clear, the path should reflect whichever of the traversal
> arguments to {{coalesce}} were productive.
> {noformat}
> gremlin> g.V().out().out().path()
> ==>[v[1], v[4], v[5]]
> ==>[v[1], v[4], v[3]]
> gremlin> g.V().coalesce(out().out().out(), out().out()).path()
> ==>[v[1], v[5]]
> ==>[v[1], v[3]]
> {noformat}
> Again, I would expect the output of the second statement to equal the first.
> The path truncation behavior would be nice to preserve in the proposed
> {{sub}} step (TINKERPOP3-716).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
