[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez reopened TINKERPOP3-760:
-------------------------------------------
Reopened as this is now in a feature branch.
If we are happy with:
{code}
repeat('i',....repeat('j', .....loops('i'))
{code}
Then I think [~dkuppitz] can merge in the LoopsStep, where {{loops()}} is
assumed to be the "top of the stack." Probably the 99% behavior. When we
support {{TraverserRequirement.NESTED_LOOPS}}, we then extend the API (and
{{LoopsStep}}) to support {{loops(string)}} (e.g. {{loops('i')}}).
> Make loop counter accessible within repeat()
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP3-760
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-760
> Project: TinkerPop 3
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-incubating
> Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz
> Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz
> Fix For: 3.1.0-incubating
>
>
> Currently we can access the loop counter in a lambda:
> {code}
> .filter {it.loops() < 3}
> {code}
> Would be nice to have a step to access the counter:
> {code}
> .where(loops().is(lt(3)))
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
