[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14652310#comment-14652310
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP3-761:
-----------------------------------------------
Ha ha. Yes it is. Wow.
Thus,
{code}
mult(Number)
mult(Number,Traversal<?,Number>)
mult(Traversal<?,Number>)
mult(Traversal<?,Number>,Traversal<?,Number>)
{code}
And, for the mutation steps:
{code}
g.V().as('a').outE().as('b').inV().addOutE('knows',select('a'),'weight',select('b').by('weight'))
{code}
but now the API is crazy.
{code}
addOutE(String / Traversal<?, String>, Vertex/ Traversal<?, Vertex>, Object /
Traversal<?, Object>...)
{code}
........so many combinations.....
> Some basic mathematical functions / steps
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP3-761
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-761
> Project: TinkerPop 3
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-incubating
> Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz
> Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
>
> Every once in a while I wish to have steps for some basic mathematical
> operations ({{add()}}, {{sub()}}, {{mul()}}, {{div()}}). Since {{sub(num)}}
> is the same as {{add(-num)}} and {{div(num)}} is the same as {{mul(1/num)}},
> we would only need two new step implementations.
> Oh, and then there's also {{mod()}}, thus 3 new step implementations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
