How do you recommend we "make the connection" ? Just bomb in on their mailing list?
Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Sep 29, 2015, at 7:13 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds like a good idea to at least reach out to them to make them aware > that this capability exists over here in TinkerPop. Collaboration with > Spark maintainers would likely be helpful. We should likely talk to folks > at Spark anyway as we might eventually find ourselves in a position where > we need something tinkered with on their end (e.g. use of enforcer plugin > on the spark side) and it would be good to know some of the folks over > there in that event. > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I was in Santa Clara last week for Cassandra Summit and was talking with >> Jon Haddad about Spark after he gave a presentation on it. He was asking >> what I thought of GraphX. I said GraphX is sort of a "big hammer" that is >> only useful in limited situations where you have a multi-relational to >> single-relational projection of your GraphRDD. In short, not really good >> for adhoc querying (just standard graph algorithms over a transformed >> graph). I gave him a demo of TinkerPop's SparkGraphComputer and he was >> like: "Whoa. Thats amazing." I was like: "Yes, of course it is." >> >> >> http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/docs/3.0.1-incubating/#sparkgraphcomputer >> >> I was wondering if we should get in touch with the Apache Spark guys and >> see if they are interested in linking/collaborating on SparkGraphComputer >> as this provides Spark a graph query language (Gremlin). If anything, be >> good for them to know about it…Jon was mentioning he would like to >> collaborate on getting Spark's DataFrame API integrated with >> SparkGraphComputer so you can (as I understand it) make "any data blob a >> graph" and query it with Gremlin. >> >> Thoughts?, >> Marko. >> >> http://markorodriguez.com >> >>
