+1 On Monday, October 5, 2015, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Andrew Fitzgerald < > [email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > +1 > > On Oct 5, 2015 4:38 PM, "Ran Magen" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 at 23:33 Marko Rodriguez <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > In the documentation we have: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/docs/3.1.0-SNAPSHOT/#vendor-requirements > > > > > > > > Similarly, we use the term "vendor" here and there to denote people > who > > > > provide TinkerPop-enabled graph systems and languages (commercial or > > > > otherwise). The term "vendor" has been stated by the ASF mentors as > > being > > > > "too commercial." Thus, we can change the docs to say "Implementers." > > > Note > > > > that the homepage already uses the terms "Implementations." > > > > > > > > Please vote whether you want to remove the term "vendor" from our > > > parlance. > > > > > > > > +1 [remove vendor] > > > > -1 [keep vendor] > > > > > > > > ------- my vote is +1 remove vendor. > > > > > > > > This vote with close in 72 hours -- Thursday 8, 2015 at 2:35pm MST. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Marko. > > > > > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Have a good one, > Jason >
