Hello,
This VOTE is now closed. Everyone agreed to dropping "vendor."
13 +1
0 +0
0 -1
Thanks for coming out to the polls and being apart of this wonderful
demo(n)cracy our great forefathers brought us. Ha -- what if you don't live in
a democratic country, can we say your VOTE doesn't count? "Please have your
dictator VOTE for you." Haha.
Outz,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Oct 8, 2015, at 8:57 AM, pieter-gmail <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 08/10/2015 16:56, Matt Frantz wrote:
>> I like "provider", too, as it seems less awkward and more specific than
>> "implementer". Also, the phrase "implementations of provider interfaces"
>> sounds better than "implementations of implementer interfaces".
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> That's a nice word. Perhaps there were times we referred to it as such.
>>> It sounds familiar but I searched around for "Blueprints Provider" and
>>> turned up nothing of consequence. If we ever used that I'm not sure where
>>> we were doing it. That being said "Implementers" (and variations) seemed
>>> to show up more often on gremlin-users in the right context. Nothing
>>> scientific in my approach of course...
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:25 AM, James Thornton <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Isn't "provider" the term typically used for interface/specification
>>>> implementations?
>>>>
>>>> - James
>>>> On Oct 5, 2015 3:33 PM, "Marko Rodriguez" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> In the documentation we have:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/docs/3.1.0-SNAPSHOT/#vendor-requirements
>>>>> Similarly, we use the term "vendor" here and there to denote people who
>>>>> provide TinkerPop-enabled graph systems and languages (commercial or
>>>>> otherwise). The term "vendor" has been stated by the ASF mentors as
>>> being
>>>>> "too commercial." Thus, we can change the docs to say "Implementers."
>>>> Note
>>>>> that the homepage already uses the terms "Implementations."
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote whether you want to remove the term "vendor" from our
>>>> parlance.
>>>>> +1 [remove vendor]
>>>>> -1 [keep vendor]
>>>>>
>>>>> ------- my vote is +1 remove vendor.
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote with close in 72 hours -- Thursday 8, 2015 at 2:35pm MST.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Marko.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://markorodriguez.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
