Release work on the tp30 branch is underway. Please consider that branch frozen at this point.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I manually reviewed the docs and they look good. The > BulkLoaderVertexProgram split between graph-computer.asciidoc and the > Hadoop section was crucial and looks good. I'm right now building and > publishing the master/ docs so we know that 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT looks pretty too. > > Thanks for your hard work today. Appreciate your patience on the matter. > > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I've just published SNAPSHOT docs for 3.0.2-SNAPSHOT. I would say that > > this validates that doc generation is good to go for Monday: > > > > http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/docs/3.0.2-SNAPSHOT/ > > http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/docs/3.0.2-SNAPSHOT/upgrade.html > > > > Looks like we're still trying to get the review complete on Jason's > issue. > > After that, please consider tp30 frozen for the weekend as I intend to > > start release work first thing Monday morning and would like to have a > > happy day of it. Enjoy the weekend folks! > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Everyone, please update the CHANGELOG with your * …. notes of what you > >> accomplished. We have JIRA itemizations, but also put them into the > >> CHANGELOG too. > >> > >> In general, every time you commit to a release branch, be sure to add > your > >> CHANGELOG notes. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Marko. > >> > >> http://markorodriguez.com > >> > >> On Oct 15, 2015, at 8:00 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Another quick status check for the 3.0.2 countdown. There are just two > >>> issues left open in JIRA on this version. As both are under > development > >>> right now, I would think we can get them through our new RTC process by > >> end > >>> of day tomorrow so that I can just wake up with a fresh mind on Monday > >> and > >>> just head right to the release process. Please yell if you're working > on > >>> those issues and don't think that is possible for some reason. > >>> > >>> If you have not done so already, please take a look at our upgrade docs > >> and > >>> make changes as needed (again, nice to have this all squared away by > the > >>> weekend): > >>> > >>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/blob/master/docs/src/upgrade-release-3.0.x-incubating.asciidoc > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Stephen > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Stephen Mallette < > [email protected] > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all, just a quick reminder that we're about a week a way from > getting > >>>> the 3.0.2 release process going. As you may have noted from another > >> thread > >>>> I just posted, I'm in the process of reviewing LICENSE/NOTICE in > >>>> preparation for that release. Looks like we are down to just three > open > >>>> issues with 3.0.2. :) > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Stephen Mallette < > [email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Ok - moved 838 off of 3.0.1 barring any SEO experts stepping up. I > >> just > >>>>> completed that bug fix to 870 which was pretty simple after all the > >> work I > >>>>> had to do to just initially identify the problem. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I'm currently working on 852, I think I will be done today/tomorrow. > >> Once > >>>>>> that's done, I can work on 319 - this only means: verify that the > >>>>>> TinkerGraph persistence works well with BLVP and write > >> unit/integration > >>>>>> tests for it. The other pending things in 319 are subject to 3.1.0. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Let's push 838 to 3.1.0, since I have absolutely no idea how to > solve > >> it > >>>>>> (unless someone else comes up with some ideas). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Daniel > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Stephen Mallette < > >> [email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> There are currently 5 unresolved issues assigned to 3.0.2: > >>>>>>> http://bit.ly/1Q7Ez8O > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In summary we have: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-852 (Kuppitz) > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-838 (Unassigned - > >>>>>>> probably > >>>>>>> me/Kuppitz) > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-319 (Kuppitz) > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-865 (Jason) > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-858 (Jason) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> My point in bringing these up is to open up dialog on any issues > with > >>>>>> these > >>>>>>> final tickets as we'd previously discussed closing the doors on > 3.0.2 > >>>>>> on > >>>>>>> 10/19. I'd also like to ask if anyone is aware of any other > critical > >>>>>>> issues not on the general 3.0.2 list - if so, please raise them for > >>>>>>> discussion. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> For me, I'm concerned about 838 which I'm somewhat tied to, but I'm > >> not > >>>>>>> really clear what we need to do. Mr. Kuppitz, can you help us come > >> to > >>>>>> some > >>>>>>> concrete steps to take for that issue please? If time is an issue > >> and > >>>>>> you > >>>>>>> have SEO research to do, let's consider pushing this issue forward > to > >>>>>> 3.1.0 > >>>>>>> and get stuff right at that point. Any SEO folks on the list who > can > >>>>>> help > >>>>>>> on that one? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'd also like to make sure the road is clear to finish up 319. As > I > >>>>>>> recall, that issue was blocked by: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-828 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> but that is complete now, so 319 should be clear. All good there, > >>>>>> Daniel? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, everyone - Please feel free to chime in with any issues > >>>>>> related to > >>>>>>> 3.0.2. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
