Thanks stephen,

I always use the same conf files but for some reason the edgeIdManager
never made it to the configuration.... I'm starting to wonder how these
tests ever passed... so weird.

Anyways, all tests pass everything works. +1 (non-binding) from me.

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Matt Frantz <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Did that script that verifies the artifacts make it, or is that for 3.1?
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > The release artifacts can be found at this location:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tinkerpop/3.0.2-incubating/
> >
> > The source distribution is provided by:
> > apache-tinkerpop-3.0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
> >
> > Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience:
> > apache-gremlin-console-3.0.2-incubating-distribution.zip
> > apache-gremlin-server-3.0.2-incubating-distribution.zip
> >
> > The online docs can be found here:
> > http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/docs/3.0.2-incubating/index.html
> > (user docs)
> >
> >
> >
> http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/docs/3.0.2-incubating/upgrade.html#_tinkerpop_3_0_2
> > (upgrade docs)
> > http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/javadocs/3.0.2-incubating/core/
> > (core
> > javadoc)
> > http://tinkerpop.incubator.apache.org/javadocs/3.0.2-incubating/full/
> > (full
> > javadoc)
> >
> > The tag in Apache Git can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tinkerpop.git;a=tag;h=8e9af13d6beb184a137067caa0445157351435ab
> >
> > The release notes are available here:
> > *
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/blob/3.0.2-incubating/CHANGELOG.asciidoc#tinkerpop-302-release-date-october-19-2015
> > <
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/blob/3.0.2-incubating/CHANGELOG.asciidoc#tinkerpop-302-release-date-october-19-2015
> > >*
> >
> > The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Thursday
> (October
> > 22, 2015) at 12:00 PM EST.
> >
> > My vote is +1.
> >
> > Thank you very much,
> >
> > Stephen
> >
>

Reply via email to