This thread has been open for a while....sounds as though there aren't any objections to hanging projected release dates out there. I updated JIRA to show the projected release date for 3.1.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:versions-panel marko, I was mostly interested in having the version in JIRA for our internal use to track against to code freeze, preflight checks, VOTE etc. do you still intend to add it to the website? if so, will you take care of that aspect of things? On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > I was just thinking today that we could put the expected release dates on > the version in JIRA. Didn't occur to me to put it on the web site. If we > did, it could link to the JIRA roadmap that shows the issues that were > slated for that release. I'm not so sure doing any of this will absolve us > from having to answer the question of when stuff is coming out though, but > it would allow us to provide a link as an answer which I always prefer. > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> What I have always liked about TinkerPop is our consistency regarding >> timelines. I think it would be neat if on our website we had a new <h4> >> section that was: >> >> Upcoming Release Schedule >> * TinkerPop 3.0.2 [to VOTE -- October X, 2015] >> * TinkerPop 3.1.0 [to VOTE -- November X, 2015] >> >> ---We can put a <small> saying what "to VOTE" means so they know that >> once in VOTE we wait for tallys which can take ??-days. >> >> Why? >> >> 1. This way people know whats coming and when. >> - I've already answered the "When will Hadoop2 support >> come?" question 2 times now. >> 2. It shows we don't lollygag and when we say something, we mean >> something. >> - So many projects make promises and don't deliver. Lets >> be so cavalier as to say: "No, we make our timelines." >> 4. It could attract the type of people I (personally) want on >> this project. >> - "These guys move software and I want to work on a >> project that acts. No talky talky, doey doey." >> >> Thoughts?, >> Marko. >> >> http://markorodriguez.com >> >> >
