Hi,

Great. Perhaps when you settle (and post 3.1.0) we can talk about Neo4j HA 
support for 3.1.x.

Also, I talked with Emil this afternoon and he was saying it would be good to 
get this neo4j-tinkerpop-api/ thing part of your release process so there is no 
"hey Michael!" in the future. However, we both don't know the intricacies of 
what you have going on over there engineering-wise so him (me) just saying 
"Thats a good idea" might not be :D.

Please ping us when you deploy to Central Repo and we'll take it from there.

Thanks,
Marko.

http://markorodriguez.com

On Oct 29, 2015, at 4:56 PM, Michael Hunger <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> Hey, I built it locally and pushed to GitHub: 
> https://github.com/neo4j-contrib/neo4j-tinkerpop-api-impl/commit/06692a477534d3eac1ecd00701ce9ea8245ca065
> 
> Still have to deploy it to maven central, just returned home from two weeks 
> of travel. So catching up on things only now.
> 
> Michael
> 
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Hi Michael (cc: dev@),
> 
> I was wondering how a 2.3.0 version of the neo4j-tinkerpop-api/ jars is 
> going. Note that we are doing a code freeze for TinkerPop 3.1.0 at the end of 
> next week.
> 
> Thank you,
> Marko.
> 
> http://markorodriguez.com
> 
> On Oct 21, 2015, at 3:12 AM, Michael Hunger 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Marko,
>> 
>> Which fits with the Neo4j 2.3.0 release which is out tomorrow, which i can 
>> do immediately.
>> 
>> Lemme pick up the discussion about HA with Philip again.
>> 
>> Cheers, Michael
>> 
>>> Am 19.10.2015 um 14:44 schrieb Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP3-899
>>> 
>>> Michael: The next release of TinkerPop3 (3.1.0) is at the end of November. 
>>> Is it possible to get another Central Repo push of the tinkerpop-neo4j/ 
>>> Apache2 dependency? Also, if you are feeling up to it, perhaps we can 
>>> support Neo4j HA in TinkerPop 3.1.0.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Marko.
>>> 
>>> http://markorodriguez.com
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to