Thanks, I have just started on the rdf path. When you say the RDF data model and PG data model are not 100% aligned does that mean that for some RDF models to PG model there will be information loss or just a increase in complexity and efficiency?
Does the same hold for the other way around PG model to RDF model? I'll have a look at your implementation to understand things better. Cheers Pieter On 21/12/2015 18:46, Mike Personick wrote: > The RDF data model and the PG data model are not 100% aligned. I know > there have been a few academic papers on the subject. For Blazegraph I am > using a PG schema built on top of raw RDF. But a raw RDF graph would not > work with the Blazegraph TP3 interface if it doesn't follow the PG schema. > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:22 AM, pieter-gmail <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Found this recently, fyi >> >> http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3288 >> >> Cheers >> Pieter >> >> On 12/12/2015 16:01, pieter wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I know many rdf vendors are TinkerPop providers. >>> >>> Can it work in the other direction, i.e. can a rdf dataset be loaded >>> into a TinkerPop database? >>> Is it possible to load any rdf dataset into TinkerPop without loss? >>> >>> Is this something TinkerPop is interested in? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Pieter >>> >>> >>
