We might opt to publish DSL examples artifacts so that you could :install them right to the Gremlin Console. That might also go well for a "developing a plugin" example.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was thinking about this more the other day. For the things I care about, > I think it would be good to have a gremlin-examples/ module that contained: > > 1. DSL examples -- SocialTraversal/etc. > 2. Language compiler -- Java RegEx into Gremlin instructions > (e.g.). > 3. Build your own implementation examples --- like a stub of a > graph implementation to get people going. > > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > On Jan 13, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Jason/Pieter, are you guys saying that you would prefer the publishing of > > an archtype over having gremlin-examples code? or are you saying you > would > > have both? also, i spent a very short period of time looking at how to > > publish archtypes and didn't get the answers i wanted in that time - do > > either of you have experience with how that is done to offer a short > > synopsis? > > > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Jason Plurad <plur...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> +1 I like the Maven archetype idea to encourage folks to build their own > >> projects. Great suggestion, Pieter. > >> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 2:03 AM pieter-gmail <pieter.mar...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I have not looked at Jason's project but publishing some maven > >>> archetypes will be useful. Especially for the more complex setups with > >>> Hadoop, Spark, Neo4j etc. > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> Pieter > >>> > >>> On 09/01/2016 21:07, Stephen Mallette wrote: > >>>> I was thinking that it might be cool to add a gremlin-examples > >> sub-module > >>>> that contained other sub-modules inside of that. Jason's "example > >>> project" > >>>> gets a lot of references and that's awesome but I'm starting to think > >> we > >>>> should fold it into the core repository (if he wants to do that, of > >>> course, > >>>> or we create a new one). > >>>> > >>>> I think we need to have sub-modules under gremlin-examples as there > are > >>>> different types of examples folks might set up. There are ones like > >>>> Jason's that sorta demonstrate how to get going with a basic maven > >>> project, > >>>> then there are ones that might focus on gremlin-driver type > >> applications, > >>>> etc. I don't think we would publish new artifacts or anything for > >> these > >>>> projects but it would be nice to be able to directly reference them in > >>>> documentation and stuff and have them link right to TinkerPop code. > >>>> Thoughts? > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
