Can committers please do some reviews and throw in some votes so that we can get these final PRs merged in?
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/205 https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/201 https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/170 (marko - you said you were working with kuppitz on this one some time back) I guess we don't need to worry about these two for right now: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/186 https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/195 thanks, Stephen On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > I cleaned up the issue list based on feedback. > > Jason, any update on this one: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-964 > > can we close? or do we need to move forward to next version? > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Yea. Kuppitz and I are testing SparkGraphComputer on a cluster (both >> SparkServer and Hadoop2). We are having problems with >> ClassNotFound/jar-style exceptions. Not really ticket worthy as its not >> "code" as much as us just learning about the patterns people should use for >> deploying jars. We will have this all settled and tested at scale (Enron >> dataset) by the end of the week. >> >> Thanks, >> Marko. >> >> http://markorodriguez.com >> >> On Jan 19, 2016, at 5:04 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <m...@gremlin.guru> wrote: >> >> > Forgot to mention: Marko and I are still trying to fix some >> > SparkGraphComputer issues (I don't think there're open tickets for the >> > stuff we're doing). >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Daniel >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Daniel Kuppitz <m...@gremlin.guru> >> wrote: >> > >> >> I don't think I get the script things done (TINKERPOP-927 >> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-927> and >> TINKERPOP-986 >> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-986>). I'm waiting >> for >> >> feedback from Michael for TINKERPOP-939 >> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-939> (not much >> >> confidence here either). >> >> TINKERPOP-943 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-943> >> has >> >> an open PR (simple stuff, will def. make it into 3.1.1). >> >> TINKERPOP-818 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-818> >> >> should be easy, chances are high that you'll see a PR in the coming >> days. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Daniel >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Stephen Mallette < >> spmalle...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> We have the rest of this week to hack away until code freeze arrives >> next >> >>> Monday, January 25th 2016. As it stands we have a handful of items >> >>> remaining - some are already in pull requests awaiting review. >> >>> >> >>> Anyone foresee any troubles getting their bits done in time for code >> >>> freeze? >> >>> >> >>> We also have these open issues which are unassigned to anyone: >> >>> >> >>> + Develop a less error prone way for rewriting strategies - >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-882 - don't imagine >> we >> >>> will >> >>> make this happen. >> >>> + Graph Configuration Class - >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-659 >> >>> + StructureStandardTestSuite has file I/O issues on Windows >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1041 - Jason, sorry >> to >> >>> make >> >>> you "Windows guy" on this one, but is this one you can easily solve? >> >>> + Validate dependency grabs that have TinkerPop dependencies - >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-893 - this was >> >>> low-hanging >> >>> fruit that we thought someone in the community might pick up - we can >> >>> probably push that off to another version. >> >>> >> >>> Comments? >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
